﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Exurban League: Recent Comments</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com</link><description /><generator>Quick Blog</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:18:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Saturday Music Blogging - The Bird and the Bee</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/10/saturday-music-blogging--the-bird-and-the-bee.aspx#comment-1037736</link><dc:creator>Jon Gabriel</dc:creator><description>Bought the album on iTunes last night. Not a clunker in the bunch. Rush out now in a buying frenzy!!!</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/10/saturday-music-blogging--the-bird-and-the-bee.aspx#comment-1037736</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:19:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Saturday Music Blogging - The Bird and the Bee</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/10/saturday-music-blogging--the-bird-and-the-bee.aspx#comment-1036731</link><dc:creator>Dr. Zaius</dc:creator><description>This long-time Sundays fan is also duly impressed (Where have you gone Harriet Wheeler!). Love the arty, 60s film-school vibe of the video.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/10/saturday-music-blogging--the-bird-and-the-bee.aspx#comment-1036731</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 09:49:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Saturday Music Blogging - The Bird and the Bee</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/10/saturday-music-blogging--the-bird-and-the-bee.aspx#comment-1036118</link><dc:creator>Jon Gabriel</dc:creator><description>Well, I'm buying that one! I hear a lot of Bossa Nova in the song as well. Not the beat, but rather the minor keys, airy/girly voice, impressionistic lyrics, etc. Very nice.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/10/saturday-music-blogging--the-bird-and-the-bee.aspx#comment-1036118</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:27:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Layers of fact-checkers, etc.</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/03/21/layers-of-factcheckers-etc.aspx#comment-1035232</link><dc:creator>princetrumpet</dc:creator><description>Recently, much hay was made about FOX screwing up references to Lincoln/Douglas style debates and mistakenly posting a picture of Frederick Douglass. Thanks for the equal opportunity catch!</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/03/21/layers-of-factcheckers-etc.aspx#comment-1035232</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:56:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on PUR genius.</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1032824</link><dc:creator>Dr. Dean</dc:creator><description>As Exurban Jon will attest...everyday is Earth Day to me.   Ms. Crawford just makes it so much sweeter to visualize.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1032824</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:45:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on PUR genius.</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1031787</link><dc:creator>Jon Gabriel</dc:creator><description>The transcript says 50%. Watching the video, I can't tell if she said 50% or 15%. But 15% of 50 Billion is 42.5 Billion. WAY off either way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, in the best case scenario, she was only off by 4,500,000,000. (Which admittedly isn't too bad for a supermodel.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If she hadn't invented the $20 re-usable water bottle, she wouldn't have anything going for her.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1031787</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:11:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on PUR genius.</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1031747</link><dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator><description>Kind of a cheap shot. She said 15 percent, which is imprecise, but isn't ridiculous.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1031747</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:52:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Plenty more where that came from</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/08/plenty-more-where-that-came-from.aspx#comment-1031737</link><dc:creator>Dr. Zaius</dc:creator><description>What about the FALN?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oh, yeah. They support Hillary. Obama's got some outreach to do, then.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/08/plenty-more-where-that-came-from.aspx#comment-1031737</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:47:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on PUR genius.</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1030806</link><dc:creator>Exurban Jon</dc:creator><description>"Inappropriately contim... condemn.. consempt..." forget it. Can't even spell that one.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1030806</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:28:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on PUR genius.</title><link>http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1030780</link><dc:creator>sebastien</dc:creator><description>Since you asked, google says it comes from the Latin 'super' and 'cilium' meaning 'with lifted eyebrow.' Delightful.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another common definition is 'inappropriately contemptuous', but I think it's clear that my intended meaning was 'having a distinct streak of color above the eyes'.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://exurbanleague.com/2008/05/07/pur-genius.aspx#comment-1030780</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:12:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>